| At an event in London judges of the 2005
COPPER IN ARCHITECTURE AWARDS have announced the results or this design-led competition,
which now includes two separate awards for the best recently completed buildings in the UK
and in other participating European countries. After
much deliberation, the judges eventually declared a dead heat for the UK Architectural
Design Awards between Feilden Clegg Bradleys Westfield Student Village, Queen Mary University of London and
Marks Barfield Architects Spiral Café,
Birmingham. The two winning projects are completely different in their intentions,
locations, scale and budget but both achieve their aims with panache. Marks
Barfield Architects Spiral Café is an artistic response at a modest scale to a
challenging, major urban site. It fully exploits a geometric idea to generate an
intriguing form that is nonetheless functional - a simple concept, delivered in a way that
is not clichéd. In contrast, Feilden Clegg Bradleys Westfield Student Village is a
substantial development showing that, even with the budgetary constraints of higher
education, architecture of a high quality is possible for student dwellings, using the
qualities of copper to contribute to a mixed urban landscape.
Other Awards included a Commendation for Page and
Parks Maggies Highlands Cancer
Care Centre, which also won the Craftsmanship prize.

There was also a cash prize for the best student project
from UK schools of architecture and craftsmanship awards. This years Student Winner
was Poppy Kirkwood of the
Bartlett School with an intriguing water bottling factory project which stands out in its
use of copper as an intrinsic part of the programme for the building, not just as a
cladding material. It addresses current architectural interest in the environment
and seeks to make water and its treatment a subject of interest not secrecy.
James Curtis of Oxford Brookes University and Stefan
Krakhofer of the University of East London were both Commended. James Curtis' Thames Wharf Bird Hide sits
in water in west London opposite the London Wetland Centre, acting as a calm place for the
observation of albatrosses. The building had to appreciate existing conservation
issues. Copper was used to allow the hide to act as a camouflaged lightweight wing,
just as twitching convention dictates. The use of copper in its preserved and
pre-patinated state allows albatrosses and wildlike alike to feel at home in its greeness,
further blending machine, bird, man and structure. The aim in Stefan Krakhofer's Pavilion Cu29 was to
reduce all structural elements into two-dimensional elements so that they could be laser
cut out of two-dimensional metal sheet. The copper cladding extends the 'time-space'
continuum architectural concept by exhibiting decay over time. Copper and glazing
form a successfully resolved surface pattern where structure and skin can be seen to
coordinate in a clever way. This is a pavilion that, if built, would deserve to be
experienced in its own right.

The European Awards saw a clear winner with Kari Jarvinen
Ja Merja Nieminens beautiful Laajasalo
Church in Finland, and a Commendation for Staab Architektens Service Centre on Theresienwiese, Munich in Germany.
The winning Laajasalo Church uses copper in strata, almost like a cliff face,
with soft colours and controlled tones, which will develop over time, adding to the
harmonious relationship with its natural landscape setting. The build-up of copper panels
is concealed with flat, striated surfaces creating an extreme horizontality and tactile
quality. The light, airy interior spaces also possess a strong quality and all the
materials used blend harmoniously.
In contrast, Staab Architektens commended Service
Centre on Theresienwiese, Munich in Germany is a bold, monolithic building, forged from a
perforated copper screen, which could be considered as a bar of gold in the landscape,
particularly intriguing to visitors. A rigorously executed abstract statement, this is an
extreme solution which works well in its sensitive location, possessing a calmness which
modifies our sense of scale.

The Awards attracted some sixty entries in total and the
panel of architect and critic judges commented on the particularly high standard of design
and presentation.
Full
list of results |